Just to prove that I am, in fact, working:
So it was possible to make a reconstruction of this skeleton with the skull of Pistosaurus. It has the length of about 3 meters. There is no doubt, that it represents a primitive Plesiosaur, the same result is also given by the details of the skull. With exception of interclavicle and clavicle the whole skeleton is drawn from a single individual, the “Strunz skeleton”; the skull is drawn from Pistosaurus longaevus. It is possible that the “Strunz skeleton” is specifically different from the “Geissler skeleton” of which interclavicle and clavicle are taken, but both are Plesiosaurs, and so are both of the same described skulls. An [sic] eventual difference will be small. Therefore the reconstruction is a trustworthy Pistosaurus. — Von Huene 1948
Don’t know that I would trust him to give my kids a ride to school….
REF: Friedrich von Huene “Pistosaurus, a middle Triassic plesiosaur” American Journal of Science (January 1948), 246(1):46-52