I have somethings I need to tell you

2 February 2009

about marmots (woodchucks &c.):

  • marmots are basically squirrels with a weight problem
  • “wuchak” is a Cree word whose corruption is supposed to have given rise to the English “woodchuck.”  However, “wuchak” apparently means “fisherman” in Cree and the name originally applied to the fisher (“Martes” pennamti), a large weasel that bears almost no resemblance whatsoever to a woodchuck/groundhog/marmot aside from being furry and brown.  Except, hold on a minute, the name “fisher” has nothing to do with “fishermen” in the first place, it’s supposedly a corruption of the French word for a polecat pelt “Fichet.”  So it’s not entirely clear why the Cree word for “fisherman” should be used for either animal.  So, WTF?  “Wuchak”?
  • Marmota monax is more closely related to Eurasian marmots than the mountain marmots of the American west, suggesting that a band of intrepid groundhogs once (or perhaps more than once) crossed Beringia and invaded Eurasia, although some other scenarios are possible.
  • awesomely, wikipedia has six suggested responses to the old “how much wood…” tongue-twister, three of which are properly referenced with footnotes.  Astonishingly, the response I learned as a child “A woodchuck would chuck lots of wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood” is absent although, admittedly, it’s not very imaginative compared to, say “42 pounds.”  Still, any wikipedia editors out there, feel free to cite microecos on that one.
  • here is a recipe for fried woodchuck, from this very useful site.  I would bet this recipe could be adapted for any medium – large rodent, you might want to adjust the cooking time:

    Fried Woodchuck
    1 woodchuck
    1 tbsp salt
    1 cup flour
    2 tbsp fat

    Clean woodchuck; remove glands; cut into 6 or 7 pieces. Parboil in salted water for 1 hour. Remove from broth; roll in flour and fry in hot fat (deep fat may be used) until brown. Serves 6.

  • More over at Oryctology.

3 Responses to “I have somethings I need to tell you”

  1. jlposter Says:

    I know what’s for dinner tomorrow!

  2. Chelsea Says:

    I wanted to know the 6, but i think your link is broken. And then I found the page and I only saw 3. And none of them come even close to maintaining the rhythm of the question. Disappointing.

  3. Neil Says:

    Oh the ephemeral beauty that is Wikipedia, looks like someone did a little woodchuck day cleaning of the page. If you dig into the page history you can find the other versions:

    1. “As much wood as a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood.”[9]
    2. “As much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.”
    3. “A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.”[10]
    4. “A woodchuck would chuck all the wood, if a woodchuck only could.”[11]
    5. “A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.”
    6. 42 pounds


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s