Death Throes pt. 2: Opisthomonotony.

9 February 2008

In the incursive preamble we spiroambulated about the corpses of mummified dinosaurs, pickled pelicans, time and a piss-covered pseudo-esker of rock, rock salt and dust. So, what does all of this have to do with experimental taphonomy?

Neither intact quail sank or changed pos-
ture during the experiment. The body of the
skinned quail sank after one day, but the head
remained attached and continued to float until
nine days later, when the 1.060 solution ac-
cumulated excessive bacterial overgrowth and
was discarded.

The opisthotonic posture of vertebrate skeletons: postmortem contraction or death throes? by Cynthia Marshall Faux and Kevin Padian Paleobiology 33(2), 2007.

Articulated vertebrate fossils, like the ‘trachodon’ mummy that popped up in the last post, are rather more common than one might expect. Of course, they’re not spread evenly through the sedimentary record but tend to be concentrated in pockets of lägerstrata.

Many of these well-preserved fossils share a posture familiar from the iconic ‘Berlin specimen’ of Archaeopteryx appropriated atop. Conventional wisdom, has often attributed the dramatically re-curved neck and flexed limbs of these fossils to postmortem contraction and/or dessication of soft tissues.

Faux and Padian Figure 1

Figure 1 from Faux and Padian (2007) showing opisthotonic dinosaur fossils. Arrows indicate key points of skeletal contortion.

‘Hogzilla wash’ say Faux and Padian in their creative investigation into the origins of this skeletal arrangement. The authors review eight different mechanisms for the twisted neck pose seen in vertebrate fossils, which I’ve sorted out broadly into three categories:

Premortem:

thumbnailserver2.jpg
1) Sleeping posture. The authors refute this based upon the divergence of these ophisthotonic fossils and sleeping postures in living animals, as well as divergence from other fossils interpreted as true died-in-their-sleepers.

Catatonic, but not opisthotonic.

Perimortem:
2) Death by miring. While conceding that this might apply in certain cases, the authors question the validity of this explanation for most ophisthotonic fossils. They note that most of these arched-neck fossils don’t display the kind of skeletal trauma (e.g. a broken neck) that they would expect from this scenario.

3) ‘Death throes’ i.e. the posture is adopted by the organism shortly before the moment of death.

This is the authors’ favored explanation, as the title of their paper would suggest. The authors focus on a symptomatic condition of central nervous system disorder that causes organisms to exhibit bizarre neck and limb contortions. This phenomenon, often called ‘star-gazing,’ is well-known in living animals including poultry with congential neurological defects (disturbing image alert 1). Star-gazing is also associated with poisoning in wild birds,

Last fall a neighbor brought a Robin to me that she assumed had a broken neck. The wretched bird craned back its lunatic head in the reaction known as “star gazing,” typical of birds with central nervous system damage. I suggested it had likely been poisoned when someone had sprayed their yard. She granted that the exterminators had just addressed her boxelder bug problem the day before, but with a harmless spray, and it looked like a broken neck to her. Choosing not to press the issue, I said I’d do what I could for the bird, and retreated to my back yard, where I snapped the poor things neck. — Rigor Vitae: Life Unyielding by Carel Brest van Kempen 2006.

In addition to congential defects and poisoning, this posture can also result from infectious disease as seen in this human malaria victim (disturbing image alert 2), and hypoxia due to drowning or asphyxiation.

Postmortem:

4) Movement of the carcass by river currents.

This might be an appealing scenario for the sedimentary geologist, but the paper does a good job of rejecting this as an important factor for articulated skeletons.

5) Postmortem relaxation of muscles.

6) Postmortem tightening of muscles.

These options are a focus of the paper, and there is good reason to think that they aren’t a good explanation for the “dino-death” posture.

7) Subaerial dessication of the carcass.

8) Hypersaline dessication of the carcass.

I think seven and eight might have a lot to say about the Solnhofen specimens at least.  Paleopathology is an exciting science that deserves better funding.

5 Responses to “Death Throes pt. 2: Opisthomonotony.”

  1. kevin z Says:

    “death by miring”

    that so deserves is own police code, 013?


  2. We had a discussion of this some time ago.

  3. Neil Says:

    Thanks for the link Bora…it was especially interesting to read Padian’s comments on Living the Scientific Life.

  4. Laelaps Says:

    Thanks for putting this one up, Neil. I’ve started to get some answers from people who daily deal with ratites about this problem, although I have to stay somewhat cryptic here since I may yet actually get off my butt and do some research.

  5. Julia Says:

    Coincidentally, my husband has just bought me an Arc’teryx base layer for my birthday. You understand of course that this was purely because it’s a high quality piece of clothing, and has nothing to do with the fact that it has a dinosaur on it. This was precisely why I searched high and low to acquire a pair of Teva “Terra-Dactyls” too…

    We discussed this paper at journal club a few months ago. But I can’t for the life of me remember what the Collective decided about the paper’s merits.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s